Rise of the conservative revolutionaries. Almost half of Republicans think an armed revolution may be needed soon.

(Salon) - There’s plenty of proof of an authoritarian streak and animus toward democratic ideals in today’s conservative movement. There was the movement’s use of its judicial power to halt a vote recount and instead install a president who had lost the popular vote. There is the ongoing GOP effort to make it more difficult for people to cast a vote in an election. There is the GOP’s record use of the Senate filibuster to kill legislation that the vast majority of the country supports. There is a GOP leader’s declaration that what the American people want from their government simply “doesn’t matter.”

Up until today, you might have been able to write all that anti-democratic pathology off as a pathology infecting only the Republican Party’s politicians and institutional leadership, but not its rank-and-file voters. But then this poll from Fairleigh-Dickinson University was released showing that authoritarianism runs throughout the the entire party.

Take a look at the cross-tabs on page 3 of the national survey – that’s right, you are reading it correctly: almost half (44 percent) of all self-described Republican voters say they believe “an armed revolution might be necessary to protect our liberties.” Just as bad, more Republicans believe an armed revolution might be necessary than believe one isn’t necessary.

This poll raises two obvious questions, each of them more disturbing than the next.

read more

According to the Farleigh Dickinson poll, 44 percent of rank-and-file Republicans seem to believe that because they aren’t getting their way through the ballot box, bloodshed may be justified to impose their will on everyone else. Think of it as sore loser-ism juiced by violence.

Kansas GOP to legalize quarantine of HIV patients

(America blog) - The Kansas legislature is about to empower the state to quarantine people with HIV and AIDS. The local Fox affiliate says the legislation is expected to become law in the next few weeks.

Republicans in the Kansas state legislature promise that the quarantine power will never be exercised against people with AIDS, but they then shot down a Democratic-led effort, by Senator Marci Francisco, to exempt people with HIV and AIDS from the quarantine provision.

Funny how they don’t ever plan on using it against people with AIDS, but then refuse to exempt people with AIDS from the quarantine they promise they’ll never use.

read more

Link to the actual document GOP House leadership sent to its members. It recommends a social media blitz, videos, digital flyers, a sample OP-ED and other messaging.

Tea Partiers Are Boycotting Fox News: Activists have a list of demands for the conservative network they believe is “turning left”

(The Daily Beast) - Is Fox News going soft?

That is what a number of Tea Party activists are saying, and they are organizing a boycott to protest the conservative station’s coverage, especially what they view as the network’s relative silence in investigating the attacks on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya.

“Particularly after the election, Fox keeps turning to the left,” said Stan Hjerlied, 75, of Fort Collins, Colorado, and a participant in the boycott. He pointed to an interview Fox News CEO Roger Ailes gave after the election in which he said that the Republican Party and Fox News need to modernize, especially around immigration. “So we are really losing our only conservative network.”

The three-day boycott lasted Thursday morning through Sunday morning, and is the second time this group of activists has gone Fox-free in an effort to steer the coverage. Organizers say a two-day boycott earlier this month knocked 20 percent off of the network’s regular viewership. (A Daily Beast analysis of the same data showed that the boycott had little effect.)

A spokeswoman for Fox News did not respond to a request for comment.

A leader of the boycott, Kathy Amidon, of Nashville, declined an interview, instead directing The Daily Beast to a website, Benghazi-Truth. The website, a single-page, 23,000-word manifesto complete with multicolored fonts, supposedly incriminating videos of Fox News’s complicity in a cover-up, and communist propaganda photographs, is kept by someone who identifies himself online as “Proe Graphique,” and who other members of the boycott described as someone who works “in New York media.”

By way of explanation, the website reports: “People ask why not all mainstream media? Why just Boycott FOX? The answer, again, is that FOX needs the Tea Party/conservatives more than the conservatives need FOX after FOX turned left, basically selling out the people who made FOX successful in an attempt to earn an extra buck. FOX is extremely vulnerable to these boycotts while the rest of the MSM doesn’t need us at all, to speak of.”

Organizers then encourage would-be Fox News viewers to wait until the One America network, which is supposed to launch this summer as an alternative to Fox, goes on the air.

read more

Benghazi cover-up? More like conservative politicians kept trying to make it more than it actually was to score points - I mean don’t get me wrong, people got killed, and that’s horrible, but Republican politicians kept hammering on it like it was another 9/11.

These folks wanted it so badly to be something that would take down the Obama administration, and it just wasn’t up to something of that level.

Then there’s the whole ‘turn left’ deal. It seems like Fox has created its own monster with these people, but there could be something else going on. In my opinion the Tea Party is trying to shift Fox ever right so that the other networks have to move right to compensate - they are trying to shift the Overton window further right.

Michele Bachmann: It’s my Christian ‘duty’ to repeal Obamacare before it ‘literally kills’ kids

(The Raw Story) - Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) on Thursday insisted that it was her “duty as a believer in Christ” repeal President Barack Obama’s healthcare reform law before “it literally kills women, kills children, kills senior citizens.”

In a speech on the House floor, the Minnesota Republican thanked Rep. Michael Burgess (R-TX) for continuing the fight to undo Obamacare.

“The American people, especially vulnerable women, vulnerable children, vulnerable senior citizens, now get to pay more and get less,” Bachmann opined. “That’s why we’re here because we’re saying let’s repeal this failure before it literally kills women, kills children, kills senior citizens!”

“Let’s not do that!” she exclaimed. “Let’s love people, let’s care about people. Let’s repeal it now while we can.”

Bachmann explained that she was fighting Obamacare because she was a “born again believer in Jesus Christ.”

“And I believe, as part of my duty as a believer in Christ and what he has done for me, that we should do for the least of those who are in our midst,” she said. “That’s my personal belief and my personal conviction. And that’s why I want our government to create the space so that we can help people, because I’ll guarantee you one thing, Mr. Speaker, this doesn’t help people.”

read more and watch the video

So, basically, she believes it is her duty as a Christian to repeal something that would actually expand access to healthcare for millions of the poor, working poor, children and the elderly.

This is religious  grandstanding and it’s disgusting. She should have been laughed off of the floor, but instead her cohorts congratulate her ‘saying things in a way that none of the rest of us are capable of’.

I my honest opinion, this is sick.

Trigger warning for rape and rape threats.

Once again Fox News viewers and commenters at The Blaze show what shining examples of humanity they are after Democratic strategist and rape survivor Zerlina Maxwell appeared on Fox’s Hannity to discuss teaching men not to rape instead of teaching women how to avoid being raped.

Of course, the viewers took to twitter and commenting on an article about the appearance on The Blaze to tell her that they “hope she gets raped” and to throw around plenty of racial slurs.

Full story at the link above.

The former chairman of the Republican Party of Florida is headed to trial on fraud, theft and money laundering charges in a case fraught with embarrassment for the GOP

ORLANDO, Fla.(The Washington Post) — The former chairman of the Republican Party of Florida is headed to trial on fraud, theft and money laundering charges in a case fraught with embarrassment for the party over allegations of lavish spending and questionable behavior.

Jury selection was set to start Monday in the two-week trial. Testimony could cover allegations of prostitutes at a party fundraiser in the Bahamas, spending on fancy restaurants and luxury hotels by state GOP leaders, criminal charges of party money funneled to a private company controlled by Greer and party leaders stabbing each other in the back.

Jurors will have to decide if Greer committed a crime when he channeled more than $200,000 of party money to his company, or whether the charges are revenge for the waning popularity of his political patron, former Gov. Charlie Crist. Crist defected from the Republican Party to run as an independent for the U.S. Senate and is now a Democrat.

read more

The party that is always touting moral bullshit and personal responsibility, folks.

The above is a link to the right wing website, Patriot Post, where they proceed to trash Karl Rove followed by one commenter calling him “a big government marxist in sheeps clothing pretending to be a conservative.”

I love it when the right wing smear machine is turned on one of their own.

Remember all the talk in the media over the last month about a rift forming among conservatives? Well, here it is, in all it’s ugly glory.

Christian radio hosts: Feminists are ‘selfish, narcissistic, family-destroying whores’

(The Raw Story) - Conservative Christian radio hosts Kevin Swanson and Dave Buehner explained on a Tuesday segment of their “Generations with a Vision” show that there are “two kinds of feminism,” the “Sarah Palin kind of feminism that wants to have a husband” kind and the “selfish, narcissistic, family-destroying whores” kind.

“Now remember, the goal is that these women have to be independent,” Swanson said on a show devoted to the idea that rising college costs were contributing to an alleged spike in prostitution. “The goal is lots and lots of birth control. The goal is lots and lots and lots of fornication. The goal is abortion. The day-after pill will help. And it will help a lot. Remember, the goal is to get that girl a job because she needs no stinkin’ husband, she’s got the fascist corporation and government-mandated insurance programs and socialist welfare that will take care of her womb to tomb. Who needs a cotton-pickin’ husband? Who needs a family? That’s pretty much the worldview that’s dominating, my friends. That’s what the college is all about.”

read more (if you can stomach it)

Of course they say this. It’s in the church’s interests to say it. It sounds like these guys are scared fucking shitless of the idea of a woman not needing a husband.

Disgusting

Backlash to a new West Point study on domestic extremism exposes the depths of conservatives’ denial

(Salon) - There are four revealing stories to be gleaned from the Aggrieved Conservative Backlash™ to an exhaustive and sober new West Point Combatting Terrorism Center report on “Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.” (For a more grassroots-y look at how hysterical and viral that backlash is, see some choice tweets here).

First, there is the obvious lesson about double standards. When the government accuses a Muslim group of being a national security threat, conservatives are quick to applaud and demand immediate (often violent) action, without regard for the whole “innocent until proven guilty” stuff. By contrast, when the government accuses an ideologically right-wing group of being a similarly dangerous threat, many of the same conservatives suddenly play the victim card, insisting that the Big Bad Government is wrongly demonizing them.

Second, the backlash tells the story of how priorities abruptly change when the context shifts. Again, when the government accuses a Muslim group of posing a threat, the substance of the accusations (how much of a threat? what is the operational capacity of the threat? etc.) are typically received by conservatives as serious national security issues. But when far right groups are labeled a threat, many conservatives’ first reflex is to defend the accused and wholly ignore the substance of the accusations no matter how well documented those accusations are (and say what you will about the West Point report’s conclusions, it’s supporting evidence is most certainly well-documented).

This spotlights the third storyline – that of the double standard that governs what is, and is not, considered an acceptable rhetorical response to a purported national security threat. In the reaction to the West Point report, many conservatives seem to be arguing that that the government is unduly targeting the anti-government/allegedly pro-freedom agenda that they share with far-right extremist groups. This move to first and foremost defend the common ideology is apparently seen as A-OK. But ask yourself: how would liberals be received if, upon publication of a report about Islamic terrorism, their reaction was first and foremost to publicly defend, say, the anti-imperialist sentiment of the accused terrorists? Such a reaction probably would get those liberals accused of “giving aid and comfort” to said terrorists and therefore being traitors to country.

Finally, and perhaps most revealingly, there is the fourth story – the one of desperate, almost comical misdirection in the face of all-too-serious evidence. In following up its original story with a piece headlined “‘Far Right’ report outrages critics of federalism,” the right-wing Washington Times tells us that conservatives “wonder why an institution that molds future Army officers to fight foreign enemies now is focusing on a perceived domestic threat.” The paper then quotes “a Republican congressional staffer who served in the military” demanding to know why West Point would dare focus on right-wing terrorism at all.

“If [the Defense Department] is looking for places to cut spending, this junk study is ground zero,” the staffer said. “Shouldn’t the Combating Terrorism Center be combating radical Islam around the globe instead of perpetuating the left’s myth that right-wingers are terrorists?”

This attempt to marginalize was predictably echoed by The National Review’s John Fund, who says the report is aims to “lump together every known liberal stereotype about conservatives between its covers,” and that therefore, “it might be wise for all of us to be skeptical of (the West Point Combatting Terrorism Center’s) other work.” The overarching point in this line of criticism is that West Point supposedly has no legitimate reason to even look at domestic right-wing extremism – and that therefore the only possible reason it is doing so is, as conservative blogger Pam Geller alleges, because it received “orders from higher ups” in the Obama administration. We are supposed to consequently conclude that any of the report’s findings should be ignored because the report itself has no credible standing.

read more

If you feel like you have Déjà vu, it’s because there was a similar story I posted about six or seven months ago about an entirely different report on right wing terrorism that got the same “deny and discredit” treatment from the right which ended with a unit of the DHS being dismantled. 

I should also mention In January of the same year the report on right wing terrorism mentioned above was put out, there was a similar report about left wing terrorism, which was released without controversy.

I think a comment I saw earlier on this story says it best:

It’s great that a substantial number of GOP Reps. in states that were directly affected by Hurricane Katrina, and were more than happy to dole out the cash when George Bush was President, and when it was their constituents on the line, voted no.

And therein lies the eternal hypocrisy of the American Conservative, when its for us its necessary, but when its for others its wasteful spending.

abaldwin360:

abaldwin360:

Whenever anything unfavorable to the right is in the news.

Re-blogging myself in honor of the right’s reaction to last night’s debate.

Bringing this back because of the reaction I’ve seen from the right across the internet today regarding the 23 executive orders the president put out today concerning gun control.
You’d think the president had banned all firearms, the way they are acting. 

abaldwin360:

abaldwin360:

Whenever anything unfavorable to the right is in the news.

Re-blogging myself in honor of the right’s reaction to last night’s debate.

Bringing this back because of the reaction I’ve seen from the right across the internet today regarding the 23 executive orders the president put out today concerning gun control.

You’d think the president had banned all firearms, the way they are acting. 

Republicans brag about losing the House popular vote by 1.1 Million votes, but retaining control.

The following link will take you to the Republican State Leadership Committee’s website, where the article describes how Democratic candidates for the U.S. House won 1.1 million more votes than Republican candidates, yet republicans still control the house.

Basically, this entire article is a boast about how gerrymandering has paid off for the GOP.

Yet, I’m willing to bet something important to me - like my first cup of coffee tomorrow morning, that republican voters will simply dismiss this by saying that “the other side does it too.”

No matter the fact that here we have the Republican State Leadership Committee gleefully boasting that they are subverting the will of the people.

Here’s the article. 

Fox News’s Eric Bolling: Schools ‘pushing the liberal agenda’ by teaching algebra

(The Raw Story) - Fox News host Eric Bolling on Wednesday accused some schools of “pushing the liberal agenda” for teaching an algebra lesson about the distributive property.

During a segment about “indoctrination in schools,” Bolling reminded viewers of a 2009 video of children chanting, “Mmm. Mmm. Mmm. Barack Hussein Obama,” which outraged conservatives at the time.

“But even worse is the way some textbooks are pushing the liberal agenda,” the Fox News host explained, pointing to an algebra worksheet that Scholastic says gives students “[i]nsight into the distributive property as it applies to multiplication.”

“Distribute the wealth!” Bolling exclaimed, reading the worksheet. “Distribute the wealth with the lovely rich girl with a big ole bag of money, handing some money out.”

Co-host Kimberly Guilfoyle explained that the algebra worksheet had put her on “high alert” for the liberal agenda in her 6-year-old son’s curriculum.

read more

I would say the ignorance on display here here is astounding, but in all honesty, I’m not astounded. This seems pretty par for the course when it comes to Fox.

This is a blatant example of exploiting the ignorance of viewers by taking a concept with a name that is similar to a concept that conservatives fear (wealth redistribution) and associating it even though they have absolutely NOTHING to do with each other and vilifying education in the process.

The Distributive Property is an elementary concept in algebra that refers to rules of placement and has no relation what so ever to wealth redistribution.

"If someone was selling a product that they claimed could cure cancer, and make you rich in the process, I would be as morally outraged as I am by the shit that Beck and Limbaugh and Hannity and O’Reilly do. But the difference is, if you buy some shit infomercial product it will very rarely affect me or other random people. When you buy into the bullshit viewpoints that these people espouse it directly affects my life and my quality of life. I shouldn’t have to put up with a Congress that does nothing because it’s only priority is to undermine the President for political gain, I shouldn’t have to worry about these bullshit fake crises every two weeks because Congress wants to make the opposition look bad, I shouldn’t have to have my taxes go up to pay for the wealthy getting a free ride, I shouldn’t have to worry (constantly) about the welfare of my nation in the hands of these leeches but I do. These men are selling a toxic asset which harms my life, so yes, I’m pissed."

— A reddit user in response to The conservative movement is still an elaborate moneymaking venture: The story of FreedomWorks’ big Glenn Beck payout encapsulates the right-wing media