Video Evidence Helps Acquit Student in First Occupy Wall Street Trial

Alexander Arbuckle, the defendant in the first Occupy Wall Street case to go to trial, has been found not guilty after video of the incident he was involved in showed him breaking no laws. The Village Voice reports:

“The protesters, including Arbuckle, were in the street blocking traffic, Officer Elisheba Vera testified. The police, on the sidewalk, had to move in to make arrests to allow blocked traffic to move. But there was a problem with the police account: it bore no resemblance to photographs and videos taken that night.”

In an ironic twist, Arbuckle was actually working on a New York University photojournalism project aimed at defending police officers working at Occupy protests when he was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct.

“I felt the police had been treated unfairly on [sic] the media,” he said to the Village Voice. “All the focus was on the conflict and the worst instances of brutality and aggression, where most of the police I met down there were really professional and restrained.”

Occupy videographer and indefatigable live-streamer Tim Pool’s clip was used as evidence along with the NYPD’s own video footage in the trial. The video shows protesters clearly using the sidewalk like they were asked to. (Watch the arrest around minute 35 of Pool’s video.)

“What’s happening is very similar to what happened in 2004 with the Republican National Convention,” Arbuckle’s lawyer told theVoice. “It’s just a symptom of how the NYPD treats dissent.

read more

Occupy Wall Street is Dead to Me

sageoflogic:

racismschool:

In the beginning, I was on board. Things happened, things I am not going to get into in this particular post, that made me want to post less and keep a certain amount of distance.

Still, I wanted to believe in the overall cause.

I can no longer make excuses. I can no longer pretend that they represent anything of value.

I just finished speaking with a friend of mine. He was at the Million Hoodie Rally in NYC last night. He was telling me all about how emotional it was. How beautiful it was that people were coming together for something so important. Everything he said sounded amazing and almost spiritual.

My friend is a dreamer. He is a “Glass half full” kind of man. He has a strong belief in Christ and because of this, chooses his words and actions in a way that he believes would make the Lord proud. He believes in leading by example.

I tell you this because one of the topics he and I disagree on is “Anger.” He works diligently to never let his anger show. I believe that to be unhealthy.

When he was finished telling me what he saw and what he did, I told him that I tried to watch the live feed. I told him that I’d only watched for a few minutes because I saw something happen that I could not handle. 

I saw OWS people trying, not to integrate with but to change the direction of the route. I saw OWS people screaming for everyone to go to Zuccotti Park. After seeing this and then seeing the arguments of people saying that this was not about OWS, only to have the OWS people say that it WAS, I became physically ill. If there was ever a time when you should have worked to keep the focus on the actual cause, this was it.

I mentioned this to my friend. He went silent. He said nothing. He said nothing for a long while. I could just hear him breathe.

I knew he was angry.

He tried to remain calm while he explained what he saw. He saw the same thing that I did. Only in a different form and at a different location. He saw OWS people yelling that it wasn’t about race and that it would be best to incorporate this into the OWS movement. This man who I love with my entire heart but often feel is far to kind said…

They wanted us to be unified but only if unity happened in their yard. They are not good people.”

I’ll leave you with that.

“wasn’t about race”

It really sucks when a cause I was behind 100% at the beginning majorly fucks everything up this bad. Good going, OWS.

When I heard about some of the horrible shit that went on at the protests, I had hoped that they would be addressed, because the motive (originally) behind the protests made a lot of sense and brought a lot of attention to income inequality and the disappearing middle class.

Now, they’ve gone and tried to shout over a cause that wasn’t theirs to shout over and then tried to tell those affected what it was and wasn’t about.

I can’t in good conscious support them anymore. 

DHS Turns Over Occupy Wall Street Documents to Truthout

Did the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) advise local law enforcemcent officials on how to respond to the nationwide Occupy Wall Street (OWS) protest movement and/or play a hands-on role in the dismantling of more than a dozen Occupy encampments last year?

The answers to those lingering questions may be found in the first official release of government documents related to OWS since the launch of the movement last year. DHS turned over hundreds of pages of documents to Truthout Wednesday morning.

read more (and a link to the documents as they are uploaded)

occupyonline:

“The growing support for the OWS movement has expanded the protests’ impact and increased the potential for violence. While the peaceful nature of the protests has served so far to mitigate their impact, larger numbers and support from groups such as Anonymous substantially increase the risk for potential incidents and enhance the potential security risk to critical infrastructure (CI). The continued expansion of these protests also places an increasingly heavy burden on law enforcement and movement organizers to control protesters. As the primary target of the demonstrations, financial services stands the sector most impacted by the OWS protests. Due to the location of the protests in major metropolitan areas, heightened and continuous situational awareness for security personnel across all CI sectors is encouraged.”

It’s never a good thing to see a government agency talk in secret about the need to “control protestors” – especially when that agency is charged with protecting the homeland against terrorists, not nonviolent demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights to peaceable dissent. From the notorious Cointelpro operations of the 1960s to the NYPD’s recent surveillance of Muslim Americans, the government has a long and disturbing history of justifying the curtailing of civil liberties under the cover of perceived, and often manufactured, threats (“the potential security risk to critical infrastructure). What’s more, there have been reports that Homeland Security played an active role in coordinating the nationwide crackdown on the Occupy movement last November – putting the federal government in the position of targeting its own citizens in the name of national security. There is not much of a bureaucratic leap, if history is any guide, between a seemingly benign call for “continuous situational awareness” and the onset of a covert and illegal campaign of domestic surveillance.

(Source: Rolling Stone)

Reddit member gives first hand account of what happened at Occupy Oakland

Video of a very intense moment from the day; Tear gas and flash bangs against youth with shields

Short version - The mass arrests at Occupy Oakland occurred 4 hours after the violent incidents ended. The arrests occurred during a march which had no protester violence, and the arrests were conducted unlawfully. Protesters marching on a public street were kettled by police after receiving no dispersal order. After the arrests, more incidents occurred back at the main plaza. The media justifies the mass arrest by using a minority of the protesters actions at different times and places. In reality, the flag-burning, street battle, and city-hall trespassing are legally separate incidents. The 2:30pm street battle became the justification for calling the 5pm march a ‘riot’, even though the 5pm march had different people, a different purpose, and no incidents of protester aggression or rioting. Protesters were charged under CA Penal Code 409, which reads:

Every person remaining present at the place of any riot…after the same has been lawfully warned to disperse…is guilty of a misdemeanor.

This was an illegal mass arrest because no “lawful warning to disperse” was given. In order for it to be lawful, the warning must be loud, repeated, location-specific, cite the penal code, and identify the direction to disperse in. This march was simply stopped with a kettle, and the only police announcement stated, “You are under arrest. Submit to that arrest.” The police cannot arrest a mass group of people for the actions of a minority at a different time and place! This post is not about Occupy, it is about the First-Amendment!

Please spread the fact that the mass arrest of 300+ was ILLEGAL - no dispersal order was given, nor was an unlawful assembly declared at the arrest location. The mass arrest was a flagrant First-Amendment violation and Oakland will now be facing more lawsuits AND Federal receivership.

read more and the resulting discussion here.

fuckyeahmarxismleninism:

Most major Occupy encampments have been dispersed, but they live on in a flurry of lawsuits in which protesters are asserting their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly and challenging authorities’ mass arrests and use of force to break up tent cities.

Lawyers representing protesters have filed lawsuits — or are planning them — in state and federal courts from coast to coast, challenging eviction orders and what they call heavy-handed police tactics and the banning of demonstrators from public properties.

Some say the fundamental right of protest has been criminalized in places, with protesters facing arrest and charges while doing nothing more than exercising protected rights to demonstrate.

“When I think about the tents as an expression of the First Amendment here, I compare it to Tahrir Square in Egypt,” said Carol Sobel, co-chairwoman of the National Lawyers Guild’s Mass Defense Committee.

(via sanityscraps)

thepoliticalfreakshow:

Occupy Wall Street protesters convened for a Christmas celebration at their old campsite in Zuccotti Park in Lower Manhattan yesterday, but when volunteers showed up with bags of cookies and food for a planned afternoon potluck, New York Police Dept. officers prevented them from entering the square, Manhattan news site DNAinfo.com reports. An NYPD spokesperson offered no comment on why the volunteers, who instead distributed the food along the sidewalk outside the park, were not allowed in. The protesters, meanwhile, celebrated the holiday by taking communion and singing Christmas carols. Here’s a picture of five-year-old Aidan Ortiz playing his plastic trumpet to celebrate the holidays in Zuccotti, courtesy of DNAinfo.com:

(Source: thepoliticalfreakshow)

sanityscraps:

Harrison Searles, a columnist for the UMass Amherst Collegian, calls female protester a “bitch” before she was escorted out by police

Today, capitalist author Andrew Bernstein came to UMass Amherst to speak at an event hosted by the UMass Republican Club.

The UMass Republican Club has its own history of sexism, with its former vice president being eventually kicked out for charges of sexual harassment, assault, stalking, and breaching of restraining orders against female members of the UMass Republican Club.

And today, one of the Collegian’s republican columnists, Harrison Searles, said to a female protester “Mic check, bitch!” This protester was here in a large group in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street, Occupy UMass, and the International Socialist Organization.

This was immediately followed by other protesters in a barrage of attacks against him, shouting back comebacks like, “What did you just call her?” “Let’s not have misogynistic slurs in here, too!”

That protester can also be seen being escorted away by police officers.

I’m the one who recorded this, and I am pissed off. It was bad enough that he said it, but once I found out he works for my university’s newspaper, that was the end of the line. This cannot be tolerated. I will not stop until he deals with serious consequences of this. Sexism can’t be tolerated anywhere.

(via sanityscraps)

think-progress:

The 2012 federal discretionary budget: Military gets the lion’s share of spending, while social priorities fall by the wayside.

(Also, whoever does Occupy graphics is sheer awesomeness.)

think-progress:

The 2012 federal discretionary budget: Military gets the lion’s share of spending, while social priorities fall by the wayside.

(Also, whoever does Occupy graphics is sheer awesomeness.)

joshsternberg:

Couple these images with stats of economic disparity, as well as language from ordinary people who have lost everything, then have them spread from platform to platform, from device to device, and watch how angry people can get. The whole world has the ability to watch. Then think about how, after coming home from work or school, people sit around the dinner table talking about what they saw online: “Hey, did you see what happened in San Francisco today?” much in the same way people sat at the dinner table a generation ago and watched the mass medium of the day, television, as their brothers, fathers, neighbors come home from Vietnam in body bags. Images matter. They tell a story.

In case you missed this from yesterday, a long read about narrative and Occupy Wall Street.

It’s a great read too!

occupyonline:

occupyallstreets:

Don’t let the media have you fooled. This is what really happened to the protesters property after the OWS raid last week. 

The NYPD smashed/broke laptops, camera’s, tents, all electronics, bikes, etc. and took $5,000 of cash from a man’s backpack. That was all the money he had left to get by.

The cops are now facing legal charges for violating their own rules and not giving protesters receipts for materials “confiscated”.

Source

(via bluntlyblue)

motherjones:

Inside the Corporate Plan to Occupy the Pentagon
Behind the growing push to slash soldiers’ pensions and other military costs is a little-known advisory group—stacked with Wall Street executives.
Wait till you read what else they’re pushing for.

motherjones:

Inside the Corporate Plan to Occupy the Pentagon

Behind the growing push to slash soldiers’ pensions and other military costs is a little-known advisory group—stacked with Wall Street executives.

Wait till you read what else they’re pushing for.

(Source: Mother Jones)

NYPD scanner says an estimated 32,000 people are on the ground on and around the Brooklyn Bridge

(Source: occupyallstreets, via bluntlyblue)

thegermansmakegoodstuff:

newsweek:

A bloodied protester at Zuccotti Park.
[Photo by Chang W. Lee/The New York Times]

This guy was stripped of his clothes, beaten by police, and has a fractured skull.

thegermansmakegoodstuff:

newsweek:

A bloodied protester at Zuccotti Park.

[Photo by Chang W. Lee/The New York Times]

This guy was stripped of his clothes, beaten by police, and has a fractured skull.