truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

Senate to Vote on Measure to Nullify Union Rules

~~~~
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans are trying an unusual tactic to nullify new labor regulations that would speed up the time frame for unions to hold workplace elections.
The Senate will vote Tuesday on a rarely invoked measure, known as a resolution of disapproval, to overturn rules approved last year by the National Labor Relations Board.
Though the measure has little chance of passage — it also faces a White House veto threat — the vote forces Democrats in tough elections to take a stand on rules that have won praise from unions and sharp rebukes from business groups.
The rules simplify procedures and reduce legal delays that can hold up union elections after employees at a work site gather enough signatures to hold a unionization vote. They are set to take effect on April 30.
Unions call the changes a modest fix that would limit corporate stalling tactics, where litigation can delay elections while workers can be subject to harassment, threats and even illegal firing.
During debate Monday, Republicans argued the new rules would lead to “ambush” elections that barely leave company managers enough time to respond or counsel against forming a union.
…..
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, called the vote “the latest chapter in an unprecedented Republican assault on unions.” Harkin, who chairs the Senate committee overseeing labor, said employers “have ample opportunity to express their views” on unions. […]

truth-has-a-liberal-bias:

Senate to Vote on Measure to Nullify Union Rules

~~~~

The Senate will vote Tuesday on a rarely invoked measure, known as a resolution of disapproval, to overturn rules approved last year by the National Labor Relations Board.

Though the measure has little chance of passage — it also faces a White House veto threat — the vote forces Democrats in tough elections to take a stand on rules that have won praise from unions and sharp rebukes from business groups.

The rules simplify procedures and reduce legal delays that can hold up union elections after employees at a work site gather enough signatures to hold a unionization vote. They are set to take effect on April 30.

Unions call the changes a modest fix that would limit corporate stalling tactics, where litigation can delay elections while workers can be subject to harassment, threats and even illegal firing.

During debate Monday, Republicans argued the new rules would lead to “ambush” elections that barely leave company managers enough time to respond or counsel against forming a union.

…..

Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, called the vote “the latest chapter in an unprecedented Republican assault on unions.” Harkin, who chairs the Senate committee overseeing labor, said employers “have ample opportunity to express their views” on unions. […]

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

The Republican plan to nullify the courts and establish Christian theocracy.

By  | Slate

Is the United States sliding toward theocracy? That’s what Republican presidential candidates have told us for more than a year. Radical Islam, they’ve argued, is on the verge of taking over our country through Sharia law. But this weekend, at an Iowa forum sparsely covered by the press, the candidates made clear that they don’t mind theocracy—in fact, they’d like to impose it—as long as it’s Christian.

You can find video of Saturday’s “Thanksgiving Family Forum” on the Web sites of two organizations that sponsored it: CitizenLink and the Family Leader. Here are highlights of the candidates’ remarks.

[FULL STORY]

What’s the difference?

What’s the difference?

(Source: hatefulatheist)