This isn’t a few fringe radio hosts, this is every major candidate from one of our two parties."
— A comment that needed it’s own post, in regards what went down at CPAC this year.
— A comment that needed it’s own post, in regards what went down at CPAC this year.
Conservative publication smears woman who asked debate question about equal pay
The conservative publication Free Beacon on Wednesday published an article smearing the 24-year-old woman who asked about equal pay for women at the presidential debate.
The article, published anonymously, alleged that Katherine Fenton’s Twitter account “reveals that purple Joose is her choice to get blackout drunk and she has a history of getting wet at happy hour.” The article also highlights sexually suggestive messages Fenton allegedly sent from her Twitter account.
The Twitter account cited in the article no longer exists.
Man, conservatives aren’t even trying to hide their misogyny, anymore.
Because if someone has sex her opinion doesn’t count anymore?
Fuck conservatives. This is like a replay of the Sandra Fluke bullshit. Any woman who speaks their mind gets fucking smeared and in the most disgusting way possible. Attacking them for being sexual as if it somehow invalidates them.
This shit makes me so fucking angry.
(Source: letfreedomlulz, via sarahlee310)
I’ve lost most of my faith in humanity.
If you dare… “Under HHS Rules, Obamacare Caters to Sexually Active Women Who Take Risks”
CNS News is Cybercast News Service, and used to be called the Conservative News Service. It’s run by
Thurston Howell IIIL. Brent Bozell III, the nephew of William F. Buckley and was the chief fundraiser for Pat Buchanan’s failed presidential bid. He also helped swift-boat John Kerry in 2004. Charming fellow really.An example of the comments on this article:
RhettButler1: At this time, we have an administration that spits in the face of average and normal Americans. Instead, this administration promotes the agenda of extreme groups like the far left gays, drug dealers/users, illegals and sluts. If you stand back and look at the situation you see the influence of the Ghetto based morals of Obama and his Chicago thugs. Some of you will slam me for this but you know I’m correct. Just look at what happened in Detroit when the Ghetto base gained control. You cannot deny that no matter what you say or what you do. Political theft and corruption destroys civilization…
bsfurg: If the American had any brains they wouldnt have gotton pregant in the first place and the pills dont cost that much any way.. it was pure lax of taking responsibilty for the women.. so lets just see if thies takes c are of Aborting.. three should be any more abortions now that the Women of the USA have free sex… sorry i meant pills..
Hey, do you guys remember that one time that Jesus saw Mary Magdalene, and she came up to him, and he was all like, “Yea, I say unto you, be gone slut!” Then he and the apostles had this big dinner right before he got killed, and he looked around and said, “For this is one big room, full of bad bitches.”
No?
Is my memory flawed? Must be too much CNS News.
Oops.
File under: this would be funny if it weren’t so fucking sad.
Michigan House Republicans prohibited state Rep. Lisa Brown (D) from speaking on the floor after she ended a speech against a bill restricting abortions by referencing her female anatomy, the Detroit News reports.
Said Brown: “Finally, Mr. Speaker, I’m flattered that you’re all so interested in my vagina, but ‘no’ means ‘no.’”
Republicans said Brown was “offensive” and wouldn’t allow her to voice her opinion on a school employee retirement bill.
Responded Brown: “If I can’t say the word vagina, why are we legislating vaginas? What language should I use?”Conservative men are so scared of us claiming ownership over our own anatomy they won’t even let us name it, yet they’re allowed to play porno music and joke about getting shut down by their wives during a session about forcing people seeking abortions to undergo transvaginal ultrasounds.
Why the fuck is the word “vagina” offensive???
It’s not even fucking slang. ARGH!!! Republican politicians are fucking jack wagons.
(via brashblacknonbeliever)
—
jojobear11 (via thisgingersnapsback)
In case anyone missed this douchefuckery earlier!
(via thisgingersnapsback)
So… he thinks men aren’t being oppressive enough?
Wow.
Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass. takes to the Senate floor to implore his fellow GOP colleagues to re-authorize the Violence Against Women Act, briefly sharing his own story of how his life was affected by domestic violence.
Though I support his opponent, Elizabeth Warren, it’s great to see him standing up to this opposition from his own party. Why won’t the GOP reauthorize it? Because it has protections for GLBTQ people and undocumented immigrants. Seriously.
Here are some of his other advertisers:
- JCPenny
- Autozone
- LegalZoom
- Allstate
- Quicken Loans
- State Farm
- Domino’s Pizza
- E-Harmony
- OnStar
- Hotwire
- Carbonite
- Select Comfort
Be sure to let them know how you feel.
(Source: inothernews, via brashblacknonbeliever)
Those MRA statistics that have been floating around, true or false, are overwhelmingly the result of the same system that causes the things we feminists have been fighting against.
There are multiple ways to skew data to show what you want to show. The point is not who gets raped more or who wins custody cases. The point is that rape victims are seen as weak and slutty (or if in prison, deserving because they are dehumanized in the eyes of the law). The point is that society says women are the only nurturers and that men are the powerful (and therefore also the violent, see the murder/assault stats).
These are problems.
I’m sick of screaming back and forth about misogyny and misandry. That’s not the point. As they are defined (not arguing the existence), they’re both the result of a poisoned well that ALL OF US grow up in. Men ARE put in shitty situations because of gender expectations the patriarchy presents. Women are socialized to fear men by society, and taught to resent men by the fight for equality. They’re also limited in almost every area on a macro scale simply for being women, which is not the case for men, though we can find a few areas where similar patterns of discrimination exist (homophobia, custody, some lesser careers). The point is just this: The current system sucks for everyone. That’s why I’m a feminist.
If you dont like being told what you can and can’t do based on your gender identity, you’re a feminist. If you just want to “win” the “who has it worse” game, get the fuck off my Internet.
MRA’s don’t care about gender equality. Statistics wars don’t solve any of the problems. It just proves someone knows how to data mine in SPSS and also how to derail arguments and silence the concerns of others that they deem insignificant.
Sick of it.
Look, the problem is that most feminists are of the opinion that oppression is simply something that doesn’t happen to men, and that misogyny exists while misandry doesn’t. Those statistics are not a way of saying “men have it worse,” they’re a way of saying “no fucking way are you going to pretend that men aren’t being hurt too”. You talk about derailing arguments and silencing the concerns of others, but nine times out of ten I see those things coming from so-called “feminists”….not MRAs.
Many feminists see it as “derailing” when they start discussing rape (purely in terms of women, naturally) and an MRA speaks up and says “hey, we can’t forget that evidence shows men make up between 1/4 and 1/2 of all rape victims outside of prison, or forget the quarter-million male rapes in prison every year.” That’s not derailing, because the MRA isn’t saying “fuck the women, we need to talk about the men,” but rather “you’re only talking about the women, and we need to talk about the women and the men.” Which is more erasing, the MRA asking to talk about all the victims….or the feminists ignoring half of them to begin with?
Nor is it “silencing” to point out that a conclusion simply doesn’t match the facts. Virtually every economist to examine the “wage gap,” for example, has concluded that it basically comes down to the individual choices of men and women working in the aggregate, and that while the socialization leading to those choices could be targeted men and women simply aren’t being paid differently for doing the exact same job with the exact same experience and other criteria. It’s not erasing, silencing or derailing to point out that the consensus by experts in the field is that what someone is saying is wrong and why. ”Shut up about rape” is not okay, but “we know that the 1 in 4 figure is inaccurate for the following reasons” is a different matter.
The problem is that 90% of “feminists” don’t believe that the system sucks for everyone; they believe that it sucks for women, and that it’s men’s fault. If we define a “feminist” as someone who fights for gender equality (honestly, and without making shit up), then the vast majority of the movement doesn’t qualify.
There are MRA’s and feminists on Tumblr who engage in these behaviors. It’s not fair for you to assert that “90%” of feminists are erasing and silencing men and ignoring their struggles, but that all men on Tumblr who care about sexism and the patriarchy and its effect on men have no desire whatsoever to silence women and bring the spotlight back onto them and them alone. I trust that you are not one of those people, but they do exist, and they ARE vocal on the internet, just like the women you speak of.
I do not accept the assertion, either, that feminists are out to blame men for the problems women face. It’s more that we feel we are entitled to blame men who continue to indulge in the advantages granted to them simply for being born male, while doing nothing to decrease the inequality between the sexes. It’s a fine distinction. I don’t blame the men of today for historical patriarchy and sexist socialization, but I do blame them for perpetuating it. Similar to racism, you know?
The statistics posts I was referring to all did erase the complaints of women by saying men have it worse in THESE contexts, which insinuated that those contexts where clearly the “correct” ones to view the issues through. Men and women can’t both be the primary victims of rape, for example. But we can slice up the statistics and see where the crime tends to happen and then we can get into arguments about the “worst” kinds really are, and I just can’t stomach that. It’s self-defeating.
My point is that statistics are all well and good, and they should be sobering for all sides. But instead, they’re just becoming a back and forth tug-o-war over who the rope of patriarchy is hanging the worst. There are plenty of men on Tumblr engaging in erasure and silencing, and there are plenty of women who are pulling out the satirical WHAT ABOUT TEH MENZ gifs, and I just discovered today that I’m really not comfortable with those.
I apologize for my use of them in the past, but I’ve come to a place where I honestly do believe that this is an open issue for everyone to feel free to air the grievances that the patriarchy has placed on them. WHAT ABOUT THE MENZ is a heartless thing to say. I do understand that there are men who pull it out in a nasty attempt to shut women up and get the attention, but for every man doing that there is a gay man being bullied for his sexuality, a man who was emotionally and physically abused as a child for showing emotions, a man who will learn to hurt his family because tenderness is not allowed, a man who will feel depressed and turn to drugs and alcohol because men are not allowed to seek help from a counselor or show weakness ever, a transman who will not be accepted due to his past, and a transwoman who will never be trusted because of hers.
Sexism and the patriarchy and feminism is similar to racism in that systemic oppression occurs, but it’s not as clear-cut. The consequences affect a lot of people a lot of different ways. In racism, white people come out on top in basically every arena, with no burden to speak of in being white. In sexism, assumptions are made of men that are not made of women, and it cuts both.
Men do have advantages, and women do have disadvantages. The socialization that occurs is largely at fault, and both sexes do a lot of things to perpetuate it, but there is still systemic POWER granted to men for being male. The power comes with responsibilities that a man did not ask for and may not have earned (giant radioactive spider of patriarchy strikes again), but there is still power. Women do not have that power. If you believe we do based on statistics that say we win custody battles and that we are less likely to be victims of assault, I don’t think we have a shared definition of power.
A lot of the statistics that show men are more likely to be harmed, that women can win custody, that women can make up claims about paternities and rape cases and win because the courts will side with us? Those are symptoms of Benevolent Sexism, the belief that women are dainty and beautiful and precious little flowers who deserve pity and assistance because they’re the fairer sex. That’s not okay. There should be no fairer sex.
I hope that made some sense. Thanks for the discussion, and feel free to write back. I just hope you can cut down on the generalizations some?
“giant radioactive spider of patriarchy”
sonic-hip-attack, you are awesome!!!
Those MRA statistics that have been floating around, true or false, are overwhelmingly the result of the same system that causes the things we feminists have been fighting against.
There are multiple ways to skew data to show what you want to show. The point is not who gets raped more or who wins custody cases. The point is that rape victims are seen as weak and slutty (or if in prison, deserving because they are dehumanized in the eyes of the law). The point is that society says women are the only nurturers and that men are the powerful (and therefore also the violent, see the murder/assault stats).
These are problems.
I’m sick of screaming back and forth about misogyny and misandry. That’s not the point. As they are defined (not arguing the existence), they’re both the result of a poisoned well that ALL OF US grow up in. Men ARE put in shitty situations because of gender expectations the patriarchy presents. Women are socialized to fear men by society, and taught to resent men by the fight for equality. They’re also limited in almost every area on a macro scale simply for being women, which is not the case for men, though we can find a few areas where similar patterns of discrimination exist (homophobia, custody, some lesser careers). The point is just this: The current system sucks for everyone. That’s why I’m a feminist.
If you dont like being told what you can and can’t do based on your gender identity, you’re a feminist. If you just want to “win” the “who has it worse” game, get the fuck off my Internet.
MRA’s don’t care about gender equality. Statistics wars don’t solve any of the problems. It just proves someone knows how to data mine in SPSS and also how to derail arguments and silence the concerns of others that they deem insignificant.
Sick of it.
@LizzWinstead tweeted this photo of herself holding an aspirin between her knees with the simple question:
Um. Now what?
In response to this garbage, which we can AT LEAST all be thankful was NOT said in a congressional hearing on birth control today. The fact that we have to be thankful for that says a lot about the bullshit going down these days.
Y’all, between this aspirin comment, the refusal to allow women to participate in birth control hearings, and the passing of laws in two (more!) states that require invasive medical procedures before an abortion (tw for rape at that link), today is so bad that we don’t even have words for how bad it is, all we can do is reblog and retweet other people’s stuff and try real hard not to cry.
(Source: keepyourbsoutofmyuterus, via seriouslyamerica)
—
TRIGGER WARNING: rape, threat of violence against women
Official Tumblr politics editor Ryking, talking about how me and my little loaf of bread were provoking men to say they wanted me “kneecapped and raped.” (via afternoonsnoozebutton)
I just wrote to Tumblr Support to ask “why is this man an editor of the politics tag?”
(via coldbitterness)
He’s going down soon. It’s only a matter of time. But we have to keep up the pressure on him. I know I won’t be backing down—this man is sick and he needs to be removed from his position immediately.
(via unknowablewoman)
(via writtenmemory4)
This is almost too poorly written to even warrant a response, but here is the actual series of events for those who are curious! Yay, storytime!
Alexander Ryking, who has a history of attempting to silence women bloggers (he told Jess of STFUConservatives and the other “feminazis” to “go kill themselves” several months ago, and has also been rude to women of color but I haven’t been on Tumblr long enough to have personally witnessed that), defended The Amazing’s Atheist’s violent rape threats on Reddit by tagging his posts with “I support TAA.”
I and many, many other Tumblr users were disgusted by this, so we decided to tag our criticisms of Ryking that night with “Ryking’s banana republic”—a reference to his co-opting of SJ concepts, NOT a homophobic dig, and the person who coined it was a queer man anyway. Someone also wrote a few jokingly romantic lines about Ryking’s blind defense of TAA and new atheism, and Ryking interpreted this as homophobic and misandric…it wasn’t, but because I reblogged it, Ryking insists that I am now a homophobe, which is hilarious given my own sexual identity but whatever.
We also responded to some of his posts with pictures of extreme close-ups of our eyes.
Seriously. That is what this guy is calling “abuse.”
We did NOT threaten him, make personal attacks against his sexuality, tell him to go kill himself, send him rude messages, or commit any other acts that could reasonably be interpreted as the “cyberbullying” Ryking claims it is. I did temporarily change my URL to rykingsbananarepublic and I make no apologies for that. Why should I? Why shouldn’t a group of feminists and their allies be allowed to respond creatively to misogyny? The only actual cyberbullying that has taken place was TAA’s initial rape threats on Reddit; I wouldn’t even go so far as to claim Ryking’s tweets to me and other Twitter users are cyberbullying, though I leave it up to the other people who were insulted by him to label their experiences as bullying or not.
Anyway, a few nights later, I tweeted something in defense of Whitney Houston’s legacy, and suddenly there was Ryking going ballistic. He found me on Twitter, called me a cunt right off the bat, and insisted that I claimed Whitney Houston’s death was “more important than the death of 5,000 Syrians” (I didn’t! Here is what I actually said!). I had never exchanged tweets with this man before, and was confused about his sudden interest in my thoughts about Whitney Houston and Syria. Naturally, I responded, told him how wrong he was, and the next day I screencapped some of the things he said and posted them here. I never expected that post to get the amount of notes it did, but I think that just goes to show how widespread the dislike for him is.
This author’s claim that I “deliberately baited” Alexander Ryking is pathetically inaccurate. There is an enormous difference between what we did,—creating a tag for our criticisms of Ryking’s sexism and general ignorance—and what he did, which was seek out women on Twitter to attack and personally degrade however he could. As I’ve explained recently, his behavior here is reprehensible because it takes place in a culture where women bloggers are targeted simply for being women. Ryking’s attacks were deliberately personal (“do you have daddy issues?”), deliberately wielded against women (“you feminazi cunts”), and deliberately violent (“go die in a fire”). There are NO similarities between the way we approached him and the way he approached us, period.
—
No commentary needed, really.
(via unknowablewoman)
I’d just like to state my opinion before writing this post as to not confuse people: I think that it’s fantastic that women are standing up for their rights because there’s no denying that in the past, women have been through some tough shit and to a certain extent, still are. I’d say that 90% of the feminists I’ve spoken to are lovely people who are genuinely passionate about working to achieve that paradise goal of a gender-equal society.
But there’s a dark and disgusting corner of feminism that makes my piss boil. I think it’s fair to say that we all know the type; the feminist who doesn’t want gender equality but instead wants revenge. Revenge for the oppression of the women of the past, or maybe something more personal. These “extremists” who justify their misandrist actions by saying utter bullshit such as “Women are allowed to hate men, just like how black people can hate white people”.
I have never heard so much moronic dribble in all of my life. How can you expect to get a gender equal society of you let your blind hatred for men poison your actions? Feminism is all about not seeing gender as a thing to deter, the passion of one day reaching a society in which gender has no meaning whatsoever; a place where men and women don’t exist, we just have people. The only way we can achieve this is by men and women working together as a team. Sexism is ALWAYS wrong, no matter who it’s aimed at!
I think if that post included any more straw feminism, it’d be a fire hazard.
You aren’t listening, and that’s sad.
Have a good life, kid.
thisgingersnapsback is my girlfriend, OP, and I can tell you from personal experience that she does not, in fact, hate men, she also happens love sex.
Fail.
(Source: illumifarti)
Harrison Searles, a columnist for the UMass Amherst Collegian, calls female protester a “bitch” before she was escorted out by police
Today, capitalist author Andrew Bernstein came to UMass Amherst to speak at an event hosted by the UMass Republican Club.
The UMass Republican Club has its own history of sexism, with its former vice president being eventually kicked out for charges of sexual harassment, assault, stalking, and breaching of restraining orders against female members of the UMass Republican Club.
And today, one of the Collegian’s republican columnists, Harrison Searles, said to a female protester “Mic check, bitch!” This protester was here in a large group in solidarity with Occupy Wall Street, Occupy UMass, and the International Socialist Organization.
This was immediately followed by other protesters in a barrage of attacks against him, shouting back comebacks like, “What did you just call her?” “Let’s not have misogynistic slurs in here, too!”
That protester can also be seen being escorted away by police officers.
—
I’m the one who recorded this, and I am pissed off. It was bad enough that he said it, but once I found out he works for my university’s newspaper, that was the end of the line. This cannot be tolerated. I will not stop until he deals with serious consequences of this. Sexism can’t be tolerated anywhere.
(via sanityscraps)