acontemporaryliberal:

abaldwin360:

acontemporaryliberal:

This is news to me. I was not aware that this was the case, but I won’t make that mistake again.

Nonetheless, I disagree with the premise: you lead by example. I think this is quintessential tenet to not only leadership but humanism as a whole. 

Good luck with your staggering lack of poise and self control. Maybe I’m wrong… maybe beating the shit out of people works. I wouldn’t know myself and I’ve never seen evidence to prove this to be a viable option. 

Look, all I’m saying is that I can not say that violence is NEVER the answer.

I have been in plenty of situations when I was growing up where it was really the only way to go. It happens.

And as far as my “Staggering lack of self control” - you don’t know me, do you?

I was married to a nightmare of an abusive woman for 13 years and never once laid a hand on her in violence. EVEN WHEN SHE PUNCHED ME IN FRONT OF THE KIDS.

As a matter of fact, as an adult, I’ve punched exactly ONE person in the face, and it was my brother because he wouldn’t stop talking to our mom like she was dirt after I told him a good four times to stop.

You can knock it off with the “Staggering lack of self control” bullshit.

You don’t know me either! I’m really sorry you had to go through that. Know that I’ve definitely gotten myself in my share of precarious situations (my father is not a good person). 

Look, I’m not going to continue this back-and-forth — not because I’m a bigger person — but because we’re really not adding anything meaningful to the discussion. I think when you get to “you don’t know me” it’s really a dead cause. At this point the discussion is on a trajectory to shameless name-calling. 

Here’s what I was trying to say:

  1. The lack of privilege in it of itself does not justify violence. 
  2. When I say violence I’m excluding self-defense; I should have clarified that early on. (Think Treyvon Martin and CeCe McDonald).
  3. When it’s a matter of semantics, misunderstanding, or ignorance I think violence is unjustified. 
  4. I disagree with the premise that violence is never the answer is inherently privileged. 
  5. Retaliation for honest mistakes (or blatant ignorance) veiled under a lack of privilege is deleterious to the cause. 

Feel free to disagree with me. 

The “you don’t know me” was in reply to you mentioning my “lack of self control”.

You took the conversation from me saying that you can’t say violence is NEVER the answer to basically implying that I think that it’s okay to go around punching out everyone who pisses me off. Do not deny it. You said, and this is directly copied from your post:

Good luck with your staggering lack of poise and self control. Maybe I’m wrong… maybe beating the shit out of people works.

Don’t back peddle, that was never what I was implying.

You also said:

I wouldn’t know myself and I’ve never seen evidence to prove this to be a viable option. 

You can take yourself down off the cross and knock it off right now. You are trying to paint yourself like a saint and me as someone who advocates “going around beating the shit out of people”. You KNOW that’s not what I meant and it’s evident in your statements above about self defense.

And yes, nonviolence can come from a position of privilege, another tumblr user put it beautifully when they said:

What these people don’t realize you’re saying is that it isn’t just cis hetero white dudes that say “violence isn’t the answer”… just that it’s easy to say it when you’re probably not going to experience violence and if you do the police will believe you and the attacker will be prosecuted and people will feel sorry for you (even if you deserved it).

It’s not easy to say it when, for example, I know if I am raped that many people will not believe me and more people willl blame me and I will be shamed and my rapist probably won’t be prosecuted and people will feel really sorry that his life was ruined by me.

That makes me less likely to say “violence isn’t the answer” and more likely to, for example, punch a guy in the nose.

The group most often ‘avenged’ for violence committed against them is cis hetero white dudes, so it’s easy for them to say violence isn’t the answer. They’re not the ones who are afraid all the time.

Which was EXACTLY my point about it coming from a privileged position all along.

howardbealing:

abaldwin360 reblogged your post: Prometheus: A Review from a guy who really liked “Alien”, thought “Aliens” was okay and thought “Alien3” wasn’t THAT terrible.

I kind of like how Prometheus left you asking questions. Also, a few of the questions he asked in the review are answered in the film…

Eh, different strokes.

okay, how are they answered?

Tell me. I wish to understand this film.

I’ll do it under a read more as to not spoil it for people.

Read More

blue-as-the-ocean replied to your post: Can you not give babies a religion? I’m atheist and i don’t want my kid to have any religion.. Can that even happen? I’m not aware of the laws regarding baptism. I’m roman catholic by paper but i don’t practice the religion or anything..

There is no law in the US that forces you to baptise a child. But religion is (or should be) a matter of what you believe and choose to follow, not what you were born into. I was christened. This does not make me a Christian.

Hell, I was baptized twice!

zenodotus5 replied to your post: Silly womerns. Emotions have no place on life. Ever. Only stoic men’s opinions and words matter. What a douche.

Women are losing ground that was already supposed to be theirs, and when a woman in power tries to put a stop to it, she gets her office set on fire. I would let them get a little pissed about it.

Too good to leave burred in comments.

iampurplemontart replied to your post: HAHA!

If you don’t piss at least one person off a day then you’re doing it wrong

That’s something I’ve actually tried to live by, if that makes sense.

There was a time about 10 years ago or so (when I was in my mid-20’s) that I was a real people pleaser. 

I tried not to offend anyone, I kept a lot of opinions to myself and attempted to be generally pleasant with everyone. 

Oddly enough, I was listening to the song “Nowhere Man” by The Beatles and the line, “Doesn’t have a point of view, Knows not where he’s going to.” Got me to step back and look at myself. 

I wasn’t me anymore, I didn’t know who I was.

I finally came to a point where I realized that there are going to be people in the world who didn’t like me, no matter what I did or how I acted or what my views were.

I had put A LOT of stress on myself trying to make other people happy. 

I’ve finally realized it really doesn’t matter what other people think as long as I am true to myself and don’t “try” to be anything.

Sure, there are some people who think I’m an asshole now, but I’m okay with that. 

I’d rather people think I’m an asshole for who I actually am, than for people to like me because of someone they think I am.

aceisonfire reblogged your post: Anonymous asked: Do you believe divorce should be illegal?

Come on, give this person a break. Its their opinion, so don’t crucify them for having one

No.

It doesn’t work that way. When someone puts their opinion out in public like that, it can only be expected for that opinion to be challenged.

Especially if that opinion is ill-informed. 

Opinions aren’t some sacred right that can not be questioned. How would the human race ever even make progress if we just sat around spewing out opinions that make no sense and expect everyone to accept them.

emmathompson64 replied to your post: I wouldn’t be here if my mother hadn’t had an abortion when she was in her teens.

I find this particularly funny after I just vented about my own mother’s failure to get an abortion. Very cute, pro-life. Very cute.

Actually, that’s why I posted that.

Pro-lifer’s always want to argue potentiality. 

My mother got pregnant in her teens when she did not have the emotional or financial means to support a child.

She had an abortion because she wasn’t ready yet. Had she not had that abortion and had not waited until she felt she was in a stable enough point in her life to have a child, I wouldn’t be here. I wouldn’t exist if my mother had not had an abortion before she had me.

eryntherat replied to your post: eryntherat replied to your post: I can’t tell if…

Oh, I’m sorry :/

Kidding! :p

eryntherat replied to your post: I can’t tell if your name is “A Baldwin” or “A Bald Win”. Please enlighten me.

I like “A Bald Win” better. That’s what I will believe your name is from now on.

That awkward moment when people make up new names for you. haha

mareclausum replied to your post: GRRRRR. Time to trade in my work laptop, it’s been having performance issues since I got it, I just re-imaged it a few months ago and it’s doing weird crap again. I’m glad I have a spare. -_-

At least its Friday :)

Yep! I’ll get to spend the rest of the day re-imaging the spare, transferring my files and then wiping my old one. Not a bad way to spend Friday at all! (seriously, I’m not being sarcastic). 

generalbriefing replied to your post: generalbriefing replied to your post: Unpopular…

Kirk isn’t my favorite; Picard is with Janeway running a close second. Yes, Nu-Kirk is the hottest (though I like me some NuSpock MUCH better), but the best captain? Not by a long shot

As far as “best” captain, that has to go to Picard with Sisko a close second, followed by Janeway then a tie for Kirk and Archer. (even though Kirk did a lot more awesome things than Archer, but supposedly Archer ends up a historical icon).

But as far as personality, Nu-Kirk is my favorite.

generalbriefing replied to your post: Unpopular Opinion?

Heretic!

I KNOW!!! But he’s so much cockier than TOS-Kirk, it was time for me to finally go public with this. I’m a bad Star Trek fan!!!! haha

zenodotus5 replied to your photo: My taco shell is Doritos, all arguments are…

Is it ok that the Enterprise in the background made me picture the opening monologue for Star Trek playing while this taco slowly flies through space?

 ‎”Captain, detecting a Tacobellian cruiser. Sensors detect heavy waves of tastyon particles coming from its interior.”

trudymade replied to your photo: My taco shell is Doritos, all arguments are…

frito lay owns taco bell so they were always doritos.

BUT BUT BUT this is FOR REALS Doritos with the cheese dust and the logo and everything! haha 

werocksocks replied to your post: You can care about more than one thing.

“But how on earth will I find enough compassion to care about TWO things at once?!”

I CAN’T HOLD ALL THESE CARES!!!!