inothernews:

blossom-bamford:

stfuconservatives:

smdxn:

Eliz. Warren wants to cut student interest rates to near zero

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has introduced her first piece of legislation. It’s called the Bank on Students Loan Fairness Act, and would reduce the rate students pay on federally-subsidized student loans for one year, from 3.4% to 0.75%.
Without congressional action, on July 1 the rate is set to double from 3.4% to 6.8%.
Warren brings up an interesting point – her bill simply asks students to pay the same rates that big banks pay for borrowing.


She’s literally just asking if college grads can get the same deal as bank CEOs. The exact same interest rate. Not even a bailout or anything fancy (pipe dreams!) - just the same interest rate.

BLESS YOU ELIZABETH WARREN.
YOU GOTTA FIGHT!  FOR OUR RIGHT!  To pay no interest on our bullshit college loans.

I wish politicians gave as much of a shit about us as Elizabeth Warren does.

We definitely need more politicians like Warren.

inothernews:

blossom-bamford:

stfuconservatives:

smdxn:

Eliz. Warren wants to cut student interest rates to near zero

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has introduced her first piece of legislation. It’s called the Bank on Students Loan Fairness Act, and would reduce the rate students pay on federally-subsidized student loans for one year, from 3.4% to 0.75%.

Without congressional action, on July 1 the rate is set to double from 3.4% to 6.8%.

Warren brings up an interesting point – her bill simply asks students to pay the same rates that big banks pay for borrowing.

She’s literally just asking if college grads can get the same deal as bank CEOs. The exact same interest rate. Not even a bailout or anything fancy (pipe dreams!) - just the same interest rate.

BLESS YOU ELIZABETH WARREN.

YOU GOTTA FIGHT!  FOR OUR RIGHT!  To pay no interest on our bullshit college loans.

I wish politicians gave as much of a shit about us as Elizabeth Warren does.

We definitely need more politicians like Warren.

"Anyone who believed your voice could make a difference, I want to reaffirm your belief: You made this happen."

— President Obama, signing a bill just now to prevent student loan interest rates from doubling. Tumblr, he means you. Keep it up. (via barackobama)

I love how this meme about art degrees is toted out every time the discussion of student loans comes out. It seems like a way of being dismissive, because I know plenty of folks with “meaningful” degrees that can’t find work or are making a hell of a lot less now than they did before the economy went to shit.  
I REALLY don’t understand voting against what would be the best interest of your particular income bracket on virtue of “Some dumb people got a degree that I think is worthless therefore its their fault for making dumb decisions because they can’t find gainful employment”.  
Maybe college degrees shouldn’t cost a hundred fucking thousand dollars in the first place, and maybe their prospects were a lot better when they started school. 
When I first got my degree (electronic engineering) in the late 90’s I started at a little over 20k a year and was making over 70k after 13 years, after I got laid off NO ONE wanted to hire me because I was “overqualified” (AKA I had a lot of experience in my field and no one wanted to pay me shit - I actually had a few people I interviewed with actually tell me this).  
I’m now working in IT making about 40k a year because it was all I could find after eight months of making it my job to find a job and there were 30-60 applicants for every job I applied for.  
I’d hate to see what it’s like for people who have just gotten out of school in the last few years, the job market SUCKS employers don’t want to pay anyone a decent wage and you damn near can’t get your foot in the door anywhere without a degree yet degrees are expensive, and congress wants to vote (or not vote) to raise interest rates on them.  

No, that fucking sucks, they can slash taxes on wealthy people, but fuck the middle class, right?  

And the justification behind it is “If someone took out over 100k in loans for an art degree and expected to find gainful employment and are unqualified and unable to find employment; that’s no one’s fault”  

No, that’s bull, not everyone who is in a shitty financial situation is there because it’s “their own fault” shit happens, life sucks, and now the government wants to kick people when they’re down and people will sit there and thumb their nose at it because they buy some line that everyone who’s finances are fucked are that way because they did something “stupid” and should be punished for it.  

I’m sorry, (no I’m not) I don’t buy that line of thinking, I’d rather see someone who worked their ass off to go to school get a break than someone who gets all their money thought capital gains or from a trust fund. 

I love how this meme about art degrees is toted out every time the discussion of student loans comes out. It seems like a way of being dismissive, because I know plenty of folks with “meaningful” degrees that can’t find work or are making a hell of a lot less now than they did before the economy went to shit.  

I REALLY don’t understand voting against what would be the best interest of your particular income bracket on virtue of “Some dumb people got a degree that I think is worthless therefore its their fault for making dumb decisions because they can’t find gainful employment”.  

Maybe college degrees shouldn’t cost a hundred fucking thousand dollars in the first place, and maybe their prospects were a lot better when they started school. 

When I first got my degree (electronic engineering) in the late 90’s I started at a little over 20k a year and was making over 70k after 13 years, after I got laid off NO ONE wanted to hire me because I was “overqualified” (AKA I had a lot of experience in my field and no one wanted to pay me shit - I actually had a few people I interviewed with actually tell me this).  

I’m now working in IT making about 40k a year because it was all I could find after eight months of making it my job to find a job and there were 30-60 applicants for every job I applied for.  

I’d hate to see what it’s like for people who have just gotten out of school in the last few years, the job market SUCKS employers don’t want to pay anyone a decent wage and you damn near can’t get your foot in the door anywhere without a degree yet degrees are expensive, and congress wants to vote (or not vote) to raise interest rates on them.  

No, that fucking sucks, they can slash taxes on wealthy people, but fuck the middle class, right?  

And the justification behind it is “If someone took out over 100k in loans for an art degree and expected to find gainful employment and are unqualified and unable to find employment; that’s no one’s fault”  

No, that’s bull, not everyone who is in a shitty financial situation is there because it’s “their own fault” shit happens, life sucks, and now the government wants to kick people when they’re down and people will sit there and thumb their nose at it because they buy some line that everyone who’s finances are fucked are that way because they did something “stupid” and should be punished for it.  

I’m sorry, (no I’m not) I don’t buy that line of thinking, I’d rather see someone who worked their ass off to go to school get a break than someone who gets all their money thought capital gains or from a trust fund. 

Senator’s phone numbers at the link.

The link goes to senate.gov

Someone please tell me again how both sides are identical.

Congress has removed nearly every consumer protection from student loans

Grandmothers’ Social Security Garnished for Student Loans

The Social Security program … represents our commitment as a society to the belief that workers should not live in dread that a disability, death, or old age could leave them or their families destitute.  -President Jimmy Carter, December 20, 1977.

[This law] assures the elderly that America will always keep the promises made in troubled times a half century ago … [The Social Security Amendments of 1983 are] a monument to the spirit of compassion and commitment that unites us as a people. -President Ronald Reagan, April 20, 1983.

So said Presidents Carter and Reagan, but that was before 1996, when Congress voted to allow federal agencies to offset portions of Social Security payments to collect debts owed to those agencies. (31 U.S.C. §3716.) Now, we read of horror stories like this:

I’m a 68 year old grandma of 2 young grandchildren. I went to college to upgrade my employment status in 1998 or 1999. I finished in 2000 and at that time had a student loan balance of about 3500.00.

Could not find a job and had to request forbearance to carry me. Over the years I forgot about the loan, dealt with poor health, had brain surgery in 2006 and the collection agents decided to collect for the loan in 2008.

At no time during the 6-7 year gap did anyone remind me or let me know that I could make a minimum payment on the loan. Now that I am on Social Security (have been since I was 62), they have decided to garnishee my SS check to the tune of 15%.

I have not been employed since 2004 and have the two dependents…. I don’t dispute that I owed them the $3500.00 but am wondering why they let it build up to somewhere around $17,000/20,000 before they attempted to collect.

Her debt went from $3,500 to over $17,000 in ten years?! How could that be?

It seems that Congress has removed nearly every consumer protection from student loans, including not only standard bankruptcy protections, statutes of limitations and truth in lending requirements, but protection from usury (excessive interest). Lenders can vary the interest rates and some borrowers are reporting rates as high as 18-20 percent. At 20 percent, debt doubles in just three and a half years; and in seven years, it quadruples. Congress has also given lenders draconian collection powers to extort not just the original principal and interest on student loans, but huge sums in penalties, fees and collection costs.

The majority of these debts are being imposed on young people, who have a potential 40 years of gainful employment ahead of them to pay the debt off. But a sizeable chunk of US student loan debt is held by senior citizens, many of whom are not only unemployed but unemployable. 

read more

A huge student loan scam — With the help of Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., for-profit colleges are massively ripping off U.S. taxpayers

Earlier this year, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to pass a bill with the impressive, everybody-can-get-behind-this title “Protecting Academic Freedom in Higher Education Act.” Sponsored by the ultra-conservative North Carolina Republican Virginia Foxx, the bill ostensibly took aim at an issue close to small-government-loving hearts: intrusive federal regulation of for-profit colleges — fast growing, highly profitable outfits like DeVry University or the online-only University of Phoenix.

Like so many of the bills passed by the House since Republicans gained the majority in the 2010 midterm elections, the bill was designed to repeal specific actions taken by the Obama administration. In this case, the issue at hand was the Obama administration’s efforts to ensure greater “program integrity” in the for-profit educational sector. Specifically, a new federal definition of what constitutes a legitimate academic “credit hour” and a new requirement that all online providers of post-secondary education be accredited in each and every state in which they do business.

read more

The $1 Trillion Student Loan Rip-Off: How an Entire Generation Was Tricked into Taking on Crushing Debt That Just Enriches Banks

Young people accepted a home mortgage worth of debt before they ever even had a regular income based on phony promises.

By Alex Pareene | sourced from Salon

Thanks to the horrific 2005 bankruptcy bill, one of the most nakedly venal modern examples of Congress serving the interests of the rentiers and creditors over the vast majority, debtors cannot discharge student loans through bankruptcy. The government is shielded from the risk, and creditors are licensed to collect by almost any means they deem necessary, giving no one in charge any real incentive (beyond basic human decency) to fix the situation.

[FULL STORY]