Social Networks for Hate Speech: Commercial Talk Radio and New Media

A study released by the National Hispanic Media Coalition (NHMC) and UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center (CSRC) found that the hosts and guests on prominent conservative talk radio shows contribute to “hate speech” against ethnic, racial, religious groups and the LGBT community on social media networks.

The study, entitled “Social Networks for Hate Speech,” analyzed the role that five prominent conservative talk radio shows play in spreading hate speech on social websites. It examined the guests, topics and content on The Rush Limbaugh Show, The Sean Hannity Show, The Glenn Beck Program, The Savage Nation, and The John and Ken Show. The study found this social network is dominated by media personalities, Republican political figures and/or Tea Party activists, while routinely ignoring alternative points of view from issue-driven organizations. Other key components of this network include Premiere Radio Networks, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications that nationally syndicates three of the five shows examined, and Fox News, whose media personalities appear most frequently on the shows.

The study completed over the last 18 months also determined that:

  • The social network of hate speech propagates a narrow set of priorities, such as messaging that often includes anti-immigration and anti-Islamic focuses.
  • In this highly insular network, immigrants are routinely referred to as “illegal” and law-breaking, while Islam is portrayed within the context of terrorism.
  • An overwhelming proportion of scheduled guests on these shows were white (89 percent) and male (81 percent), matching the race and gender of the hosts.
  • Political figures who appeared as guests were largely members of the Republican Party (93 percent) and/or affiliated with the Tea Party movement (89 percent).
  • The top five ideological positions of scheduled guests were determined to be anti-federalist (23.6 percent), pro-Republican (19.1 percent), pro-Tea Party Movement (12.1 percent), anti-Islamic (11.1 percent)and anti-immigration (8.5 percent).
  • Though 88 topics of interest were identified, immigration emerged as the most discussed topic, dominating nearly one-quarter (23.9 percent) of all topic segments.

Source: National Hispanic Media Coalition

Authors: Chon Noriega Francisco Javier Iribarren

Links to Sources Social Networks for Hate Speech: Commercial Talk Radio and New Media

What Romney’s Right-Wing Media Revolt Reveals About The GOP

As Mitt Romney’s team continues to try to defuse the recent conservative rebellion regarding the state of his campaign, it’s telling that the right-wing media led the rear-guard charge.

Traditionally, when campaign revolts bubble up they’re reported in the media, not initiated there. In the past, it was nervous party elites, major donors, state party chairmen, members of Congress and their top aides who aired complaints, through the media, when they felt their party’s candidate was falling down, or that his campaign was in need of a course correction.

This time it’s the right-wing media that’s taken upon itself to launch a running critique of Romney’s campaign:

  • Fox’s Eric Bolling says Romney should fire his whole staff
  • Fox’s Brian Kilmeade suggests Romney has to “toughen up”
  • Fox’s Bill Kristol compares Rommey to Michael Dukakis and John Kerry and says he needs to “get off autopilot.”
  • Fox owner Rupert Murdoch tweets that Romney needs to shake up his staff
  • Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal editorial page eviscerates Romney’s campaign team as being incompetent
  • Fox’s Laura Ingraham mocks Romney’s jet-skiing ways

Did you spot the trend?

It’s amazing how the conservative press feels completely empowered at this point to brazenly dictate how the Republican Party candidate ought to run for the White House.

read more

I mean, it’s not like right wing media controls the republican party … right? … RIGHT??? /s

How Fox News and Right Wing Media Have Pushed the Political Conversation in the U.S. to the Far Right.

By Aaron Baldwin - Activate the Mechanism! 

It’s easy to simply call these people “dumb”. The problem is, I’ve known some very “intelligent” conservatives.

I think a big part of the issue is the media. The right has set up this “echo chamber” of alternate reality news. Fox News and right wing talk radio are in lock-step with each other, so every” issue”, every story you hear on one is echoed on the other and both will say that the main stream media are liars (which is true to a point) and that they are the only ones telling the “truth”.

The other problem is the main stream media doesn’t really do anything to dispel these accusations, they do lie and get caught doing so.

The media has also set up this whole “false parallel” in order to try and appear centrist. They will for example, compare the fact that Rush Limbaugh went on a three day verbal assault against a single person for testifying before congress about birth control coverage, drag her name through the mud call her a “whore” and demand that if “taxpayers are paying for her birth control” that she has to post videos on line of her having sex to the fact that a liberal comedian called Sarah Palin the “C word” as if those two things were equal to each other. 

This way no matter how outlandish things the right wing media are saying, they can say “well the other side is just as bad” and main stream media will continue this narrative in order to appear balanced and unbiased. 

One example I like to use is this:

During the Clinton presidency, former Clinton press secretary Dee Dee Myers once opined that if Clinton and Dole had a debate, and Dole claimed that the moon was made of green cheese while Clinton pointed out that it was made of rock, the headline would read, “Clinton, Dole debate moon content”, and completely ignore how ridiculous Dole’s claim was. 

The media, in an attempt to avoid a charge of bias, will accept anything the right says as a reasonable argument, no matter how unreasonable it really is.

You only have to look as far as politically charged topics such as climate change, abortion and now (because the right has made an issue of it) birth control.

A buzz is created in right wing media, then the main stream media does little to dispel it. Right wing media also has a way of using several mental “hacks” to drive their message to the masses. They often portray their political opponents as “stupid” or “weak” and have turned liberal into a word that basically means “dirty communist hippy” therefore anything a liberal proposes politically is just a bunch of lazy hippies (or minorities) that want to steal tax payer money from hard working Americans. 

The blueprint for Fox News was conceived during the Nixon era, and was basically a way to push pro-right wing talking points on the public and push the conversation in the US to the right, and they have succeeded. 

Here’s more on Roger Ailes and Fox News: http://gawker.com/5814150

Talk radio is larger than any other media platform and it is dominated by conservative programming. The raw numbers of Americans listening to talk radio dwarf all other political media. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck are the top three talk personalities in the nation who reach a combined near 40 million listeners each week — nearly ten times greater than the combined audiences of Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, Headline News and CNBC. According to the Pew Research Center for People & the Press, Republican listeners make up only 41 percent of that audience with 28 percent being Democrats and Independents making up 31 percent. Despite that demographic spread, roughly 90 percent of all weekday talk radio programming is conservative and less than 10 percent is progressive.

The last time Democrats focused any strategic attention on radio was in 2004 when Air America launched the national careers of Rachel Maddow, Thom Hartmann, and Randi Rhodes. That same year, I created The Ed Schultz Show and The Stephanie Miller Show. Still stinging over a lost election in 2000 (that they really won), Democrats endeavored to create communications infrastructure to rival the well-established Republican message machine. With a rather diminutive amount of financial investment by progressives, substantial gains were made with the emergence of Schultz, Maddow, Miller and others.

Since that time, Democrats have offered virtually no structural support to encourage the growth of progressive media. They simply don’t see the value. Amazingly, democratic campaign advertising dollars continue to flow to conservative radio stations throughout the nation (because they have the biggest audience), and the President (who is a Democrat) is more likely to be a guest on a conservative program over its progressive counterpart. Having supported the creation of progressive media eight years ago, Democrats mistakenly believe it needs to survive and grow on its own without Democratic support. That’s like giving birth to a baby then putting it out on the street to fend for itself. In the meantime, Republican organizations continue to fully support conservative talk radio maintaining their overwhelming media advantage.

I’m not sure a lot of folks who don’t listen to conservative radio get just how relevant what these bile spewers say is to right wing political supporters. They are much more of a mouthpiece than Fox News and spread a lot more “information”. 

(Source: azspot, via sarahlee310)

It’s not just Rush: 98 Advertisers now fleeing from all right wing radio shows

Rush Limbaugh gave the right wing talk radio industry juice, and he just might be the cause of its demise. 98 advertisers so far have jumped ship from Rush Limbaugh’s show and other right wing stations due to the fallout from his 4 day long misogynistic attack on a Georgetown coed.

Daily Beast reports, “There are already tangible signs that the three dozen national and local advertisers that have pulled their ads from The Rush Limbaugh Show are having a financial impact.”

Premiere Networks distributes Limbaugh as well as a host of other right-wing talkers — they quickly sent an email out to its affiliates early Friday.

read more

How conservative media has set us down the wrong path.

I don’t know if it’s the copious amounts of coffee I’ve drank this morning, or the hour long conversation Brittany and I had earlier about this, but I feel like ranting.

It would take less than five minutes of looking over my blog or Facebook wall to be able to tell that I’m pretty fucking unhappy with the state of the country right about now.

But, what I got to thinking about today, is, how did it get this way? I have a theory, and most of it goes back to conservative media.

I remember a time when everyone sat down to watch the six-o’-clock news, I remember real journalism. I remember when journalists would call out politicians on their bullshit, and not in a sensational over the top way, but by reporting on what politicians say, then presenting the facts.

I remember news anchors who sat stoically behind a desk reporting current events in an even matter of fact tone.

I can’t remember exactly when the sift happened, but I feel like it was some time in the mid to late 90’s, suddenly news got much more sensational. Fox News started becoming very popular among the “media has a liberal bias” crowd. Conservative talk radio seemed like it started becoming much more popular. The opinion that the media had a liberal agenda suddenly got very widespread, and “the press” - journalism, suddenly lost all creditability.

Suddenly, the “press” which had traditionally acted as a sort of “check” against the government, meant nothing of value to the general public.

Then conservative talk radio started getting very popular.

Have you ever actually listened to any conservative talk radio? This shit is ludicrous, but there is one overreaching theme, one that I’ve noticed among conservative commentators on a whole. That’s this whole mentality of, “People who don’t agree with me are stupid.”

They seem angry and fired up presenting their “facts” (like if there is a refrigerator in your home, you can’t possibly be poor) and add colorful commentary, it’s a very slick psychological “hack” they tell you this shit and then add that you’re stupid or a pin-head or whatever if you don’t agree with them.

Sound familiar?

Remember the “cool” kids in school? Remember how so many people kissed their asses no matter how big of a douche nozzle they were and wanted to be like them?

Think about this, diehard liberals or conservatives don’t win the “big” elections, swing voters do. The people sitting on the fence make the most important contribution to the political process among the people.

Going back to the high-school analogy, lets say the die hard conservatives are the jocks and the popular kids, and lets say the diehard liberals are the nerdy kids, the hippie kids and socially awkward kids.

The swing voters are everyone else, the faceless masses, the average Joes, the kids the jocks and popular kids don’t go out of their way to pick on. The same kids that would just stand there and watch while a jock bullies the shit out of a nerdy kid, then comment to their friends about how “[insert jock kid’s name here] beat the shit out of [insert nerd’s name here].

These people sway with public opinion, and in the high-school example isn’t going to call out a jock or popular kid because there could be a backlash from them.

Now look at the people that listen to conservative media and get all fired up about it. They think anyone who disagrees with them are crazy or stupid and they have confirmation about this everyday through conservative media.

They start talking to other people about it, people who are easily swayed by popular opinion. They might not even keep up with current events much, but they hear how stupid liberal socialists are going to destroy our country and take our jobs.

We like to believe swing voters are the ones who rise above partisan politics, who vote according to issues with concern them, and while some of them may be like that, there are several more who are like the faceless masses in high-school. They go with popular opinion, they don’t want to be seen as a “loony leftist” or “stupid liberal”.

The aggression with which the right attacks the left pushes the masses right, they don’t want to be the “dumb ones” they don’t want to be filthy hippies or lazy socialists, they don’t want to be seen as stupid.

Though their specific use of language, emotion based ad-hominem attacks on the left, suddenly everything on the left is invalid, stupid, “tinfoil hat”, pin-head rhetoric, and no one wants to be seen like that.

Look at political arguments on Facebook, twitter, and even right here on tumblr. Look at the tone from conservatives, snarky down their nose, morally superior, attacks sounding a lot like what you hear from conservative media.

How many of the faceless, sitting on the fence, swayed by public opinion masses are going to stand up against that.

Not many, just like the kids in school, they are going to sit there and maybe even snicker a bit, while the jock gives the geeky kid a wedgie.

And when they grow up they’re going to vote at the polls with emotions, with not wanting to be seen as “stupid”.

It’s my honest opinion that conservative media and it’s collective tone has done more to divide this country than any other force.